Skip to main content

Power vs. Leadership on the Reservation

Moving home to the Rosebud in July 2013 has brought so much of what I have learned about leadership to fruition.  My experiences have largely been working and living off-reservation for the past 16 years, with a couple of years mixed in on-reservation as well.

Some issues are the same, including the prevalent fear that many on the reservation have of returning Urban Indians like myself.  My assumption is that with outside education and experience, we bring about some type of "invisible threat" to the institutions and establishments on the reservation.  This breeds itself into rejection in many ways, shapes, and forms.  For example, I am very interested to find out soon if I will make it onto the Tribal Education Committee.  I applied two weeks ago.  Clearly, I am qualified to serve in a leadership role in my Tribe, with a bachelors and masters in education, teaching experience, and over twenty years of experience in the education field.  However, with all of the knowledge and experience behind me, I anticipate rejection and not being selected.

This brings to light the issue of power.  Power on the reservation is in the name of power.  It has no other precedent except status quo.  Status quo is maintained by whomever can remain the quietest and support the popular view, however much detriment it may bring to the people.  It runs quite the opposite of off-reservation life.  Off the reservation, a community is empowered by strong people who have a good background and much to offer in the field of education.  The community is strengthened by people with applicable experience; people who have walked the walk and talked the talk, and who have proven themselves to be good leaders outside of his/her own peer group or familiar group.

Power is for power's sake.  It is for the introduction of "I am the Director of ______."  Or, "I am the President of _________."  Micromanagement and asserting one's chest out full of the ability to chastise, berate, and criticize is often the mode of business.  It is a system full of power for the sake of being powerful.

All would be well, IF the children in our community had high school and college retention rates as high as those in successful communities.  It would be well if the balance of power were teaching students what they needed to know to be successful in a four year college education.  If the system of power for power's sake worked, we would be working, instead of hiding behind an unemployment rate of over 70-80 percent.  Our people would have money outside of the few days per month they are able to buy things that they needed for their families and homes.  Power for power's sake is power in a vacuum.

Leadership is lacking.  Leadership is what leads a people out of despair, out of poverty, and out of cultural disintegration.  Leadership is what people do who don't desire power, but who use the power they have for the good of a common goal, and work hard to equalize the world they live in for the constituents they represent.  It is not the idea of taking credit and leading with full charge of "don't question me" power.  It is as Nelson Mandela defines a leader... Someone who leads from behind and allows others to take credit for things they have done if necessary.  Leadership is taking the front line in the face of danger only, to shield people from the rampant abuse of power that lead to the problems that oppressed and impoverished a society of people for generations.

It is a somber moment to sit and reflect on the imbalance of power on the reservation.  It is a sad feeling to see the people who suffer, and those who go without.  It is hard to imagine a reservation beyond the statistics when power is power, and any challenge to the status quo is unpopular.

However, the last time that I checked, popularity might win an election, but it doesn't change failing systems, failing economies, or an oppressed and impoverished group of people.



Top Blogs

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Autism - a Native American Lakota Perspective

On Jan. 5th, 2009, my middle daughter (J.M.) was diagnosed with autism. "Classic Autism." The words still ring in mid-air. She was diagnosed at 2 yrs. 6 mos. As young as you can be, really, to get a true diagnosis (so I read). Recently I was asked, "How did you know?" It was a lot of different behaviors, combined with her not talking by 2 yrs to lead me to start researching. I looked and searched for countless hours... putting square pegs into round holes in my mind. I wanted something to show me, tell me, anything to point me toward NO! She DOES NOT have autism. But that answer never came. It was a long process, and is still in the works. But we are growing stronger. I think of her prognosis from when she was 10 weeks gestation. She tested positive for the blood test labeled quad screen. Which, along with a second-level sonogram, tested her positive for downsyndrome. Longer story than this, but we wanted her and she was born. She was always hard to tak

#NoDAPL Stop the Dakota Access Pipeline

#NoDAPL  #NoDakotaAccess #Stand4StandingRock Stand for Standing Rock By Lynne Colombe Mitakuyapi, le miye ZiZiWin.  Hello my relatives, I am Yellow Woman.  I have never used that name, "Yellow Woman," in writing.  It was a name that my great-grandmother, Carrie Roubideaux-Bordeaux, gave to me because I did not have "an Indian name."  She gave me her name because I am an identical twin; and I was born jaundiced.  And, because that was her name, so she gave it to me. There was no ceremony, no feather placed in my hair, no kiss upon my forehead.  My great-grandmother and great-grandfather on my mother's side were the only grandparents on that side I would ever really know.  My maternal grandmother passed away when my mother was only 15 years old; and my material grandfather lived out of state and had a different family. I think of my childhood as "peculiar" in many ways.  First, because I am 1/2 White and live on an Indian Reservation; and

Teach for America, and Rosebud?

Upon returning to the Rosebud Sioux Indian Reservation in June 2011, I was shocked to hear that there are over 75 Teach for America teachers between Rosebud and Pine Ridge.  At first, I did not form any opinion on the fact that many of these teachers are coming in from all over the United States, and that many who work in the high school do not actually have a teaching degree. Aside from the obvious problem that we have another group of government-funded teachers sent out to the Reservation with their idealistic mindsets about "saving the Indian," the larger problem seems to be that there is an actual "Native American Initiative."  This initiative, sponsored by Teach for America, has failed to inform the communities they are teaching in, that there is an initiative in the first place. From my first observations, I can see that this is another "Waiting for Superman" moment for our Tribe.  I propose that money would be better spent if Teach for America t